Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply.

Hilda Olson covers the chemical industry for Bern Securities. Based on conversations with two executives of InterChem, a major producer of synthetic fabrics, she issues a generalized sector report claiming that "according to a survey of industry executives, rayon feedstocks will be in short supply for at least the next 12 months." In addition, Olson recommends Han Chemical, a major producer of rayon, which has routinely reported higher profits than its competitors and should be well positioned to gain further from reduced supply.

In her efforts to learn more about Han Chemical and support her recommendation, Olson scrambles to compile a research report on the firm. She reproduces financial data provided in a research report by Standard & Poor’s (S&P) and the Bank of Korea (BOK), the Korean government’s central bank. She also obtains two research reports from brokerage firms with operations in Korea, and incorporates portions of the text and charts from these reports into her research report.

Olson describes Han Chemical in her research report as "low risk," even though she knows that the operating risk of the chemical industry is above average and that Han has a higher debt-to-equity ratio than its average competitor. She justifies this to her supervisor by saying that since the market for rayon feedstocks is tight, an investment in Han has a very low risk of suffering a loss in the near term. Olson’s supervisor accepts her explanation as valid and the report is issued to the firm’s clients.

Shortly after issuing her research report, Olson visited Han Chemical’s operations in New Jersey. During her conversation with the firm’s vice president of operations, who is also one of Bern’s personal trust clients, she was told in confidence that Han Chemical’s profit margins are higher than its competitors, partly because they routinely discharge untreated chemical waste into the Delaware River in order to reduce production costs. Such action is a direct violation of U.S. environmental laws.

When Olson returns from her trip to New Jersey, Wolfgang Hundt, director of research at Bern Securities, requests a meeting. Hundt has developed a compliance procedure and has provided relevant written information to employees. Every quarter, he issues written reminders regarding the program to Olson and her peers, so when Olson tells Hundt of Han’s chemical dumping, he immediately begins an investigation into the violation.

With regard to the information Olson received from Han Chemical’s Vice President of Operations, the most appropriate course of action for Olson to take would be to:
A . not divulge such information in her client research since she now lacks independence and objectivity.
B . divulge the information to her employer because, even though received in confidence, it involves an illegal act.
C . divulge the information in her client’s research department in order to demonstrate due diligence in performing her research.

View Answer

Answer: B

Explanation:

In most cases, it would be a violation of CFA Institute Standards to divulge information, which was transmitted in confidence.

However, under Standard III(E) Preservation of Confidentiality, an exception is made for information pertaining to an illegal act. Especially since she has issued a research report and buy order for Han, she is compelled under the Standard to divulge such information. She should address the matter with Bern’s chief compliance officer as the first step in the process. (Study Session 1, LOS Lb)