What would be two acceptable outcomes of the discussion?

During the Sprint Review, the Product Owner decides to release the current Increment to production. The stakeholders suggest temporarily delaying the next Sprint in order to respond more quickly to user feedback after the release. The Product Owner prefers to continue to the next Sprint and make progress towards the next release. Steven, the Scrum Master, begins facilitating the discussion.

What would be two acceptable outcomes of the discussion? (Choose two.)
A . Continue with the Sprints and include the customer feedback in the Product Backlog.
B . Delay the next Sprint to allow the Development Team to work on new customer feedback.
C . Continue with the Sprints but shorten the Sprint time-boxes to allow for shorter feedback loops.
D . Continue with the Sprints but allow the Sprint Goal within the Sprint to change according to the customer feedback.

Answer: AC

Explanation:

A new Sprint starts immediately after the conclusion of the previous Sprint. Delaying the start of the next Sprint interrupts progress and can reduce the Time-to-Market. Shortening the Sprint length allows the team to respond quicker to changes outside of the Sprint plan and while still allowing delivery of business value. Adding user feedback to the Product Backlog helps the Product Owner with ordering the backlog to maximize the flow of value.

During the Sprint no changes are made that would endanger the Sprint Goal.

Latest PSM II Dumps Valid Version with 180 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments