Why would we not include an end user’s PC device in a QoS trust boundary?

Why would we not include an end user’s PC device in a QoS trust boundary?
A . The end user could incorrectly tag their traffic to bypass firewalls.
B . There is no reason not to include an end user’s PC device m a QoS trust boundary
C . The end user may incorrectly tag their traffic to be prioritized over other network traffic
D . The end user could incorrectly tag their traffic to advertise their PC as a default gateway.

Answer: B

Latest 350-801 Dumps Valid Version with 103 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sidheeuq
sidheeuq
3 years ago

C is the correct answer not B.

Note:-if DSCP Expedited Forwarding (EF) received priority services throughout the enterprise, a user could easily configure the NIC on a PC to mark all traffic to DSCP EF, thus hijacking network priority queues to service their non-real time traffic. Such abuse could easily ruin the service quality of real time applications (like VoIP) throughout the enterprise. For this reason, the clause “as close as… administratively feasible” is included in the design principle.