Which replacement to the on-premises file share is MOST resilient and durable?

A solutions architect must migrate a Windows Internet Information Services (IIS) web application to AWS. The application currently relies on a file share hosted in the user’s on-premises network-attached storage (NAS). The solutions architect has proposed migrating the MS web servers to Amazon EC2 instances in multiple Availability Zones that are connected to the storage solution, and configuring an Elastic Load Balancer attached to the instances

Which replacement to the on-premises file share is MOST resilient and durable?
A . Migrate the file share to Amazon RDS
B . Migrate the file share to AWS Storage Gateway
C . Migrate the file share to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server
D . Migrate the file share to Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS)

Answer: C

Latest SAA-C02 Dumps Valid Version with 230 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments