Network Appliance NS0-509 NetApp Certified Implementation Engineer – SAN, ONTAP Online Training

For the examinees who are the first time to participate Network Appliance NS0-509 exam, choosing a good pertinent training program is very necessary. Exam4Training can offer a specific training program for many examinees participating in NetApp Certified Implementation Engineer – SAN, ONTAP exam. Our Network Appliance NS0-509 NetApp Certified Implementation Engineer – SAN, ONTAP Online Training includes simulation test before the formal examination, specific training course and the current Network Appliance NCIE-SAN Specialist Certification NS0-509 exam which has 95% similarity with the real exam. Please add Exam4Training to you shopping car quickly.

Page 1 of 4

1. An administrator has an AFF A200 cluster at their primary site that is used for FC connectivity to servers. For disaster recovery purposes they want to start replicating their data to another AFF A3Q0 cluster In a secondary location. The AFF A300 is In a site that has no FC or FCoE capable switches, and is currently only used for CIFS data. A cluster peering relationship already exists between the two clusters.

Which three additional actions are needed for the data to be ready for access from hosts at the secondary site? (Choose three.)

2. Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit, which type of zoning should be used?

3. Exhibit.

A customer has an AFF A200 with a LUN residing in a volume by Node 4. The default Selection Mapping settings are effect. During a planned takeover cluster test, Node 3 performs a take over of Node 4.

Referring to the exhibit, what is the expected number of paths seen from the host?

4. You have inherited a small FC SN infrastructure that consists of 15 servers (hosts), two Cisco MDS 9148s switches, and a 4-node NetApp AFF A300 cluster. You suspect that your predecessor did not configure zoning according to best practices.

In this scenario, what information is necessary to audit your SAN zoning? (Choose two.)

5. Exhibit.

A Linux host cannot discover a newly provisioned LUN.

Referring to the exhibit, what would be the cause of the problem?

6. Exhibit.

Referring to the exhibit.

What are two viable scenarios to test LUN multipathing on Host 1?

(Choose two.)

7. Which formula is appropriate for calculating target port Queue Depth?

8. When planning out a new FC SAN implementation for a AFF cluster, which two variables should be considered for a highly-available, resilient solution? (Choose two.)

9. Exhibit.

A customer is testing a dual-fabric FC SAN configuration as shown in the exhibit and the zones are implemented on the switches shown below.

If all the nodes are in the SLM reporting nodes list, hoe many path per LUN should the customer expect when simulating an FC SFP failure by bringing LIF_3 offline?

10. An administrator has a 2node AFF ONTAP cluster named cl1. A Windows 2016 server has 10 FC LUNs mapped from the cluster , and the administrator can multiple paths to each LUN, During a scheduled storage failover, node cl1-02 took over cl1-01, and Windows server lost connectivity to all mapped LUNs but reestablished connectivity after the giveback operation finished.

In the scenario, what would cause the LUN connectivity outage?


 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  • Sign up
Lost your password? Please enter your username or email address. You will receive a link to create a new password via email.
We do not share your personal details with anyone.