Which HA/DR design should be recommended, given the supported options?

A customer has asked for recommendations around a disaster recovery architecture design for VMware Workspace ONE Access. The customer has an extremely aggressive recovery point objective and recovery time objective.

Which HA/DR design should be recommended, given the supported options?
A . Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, One 3-node cluster Datacenter 1 and the other 3-node cluster m Datacenter 2. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/passive configuration.
B. Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters. One 3-node cluster Datacenter 1 and the other 3-node cluster m Datacenter 2. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/active configuration.
C. Multi datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, Both 3-node clusters are spanned
across both datacenters, two nodes in one datacenter and one in the other, respectively.
The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/active configuration.
D. Multi-datacenter design with two 3-node clusters, Both 3-node clusters are spanned across both datacenters, two nodes in one datacenter and one in the other, respectively. The two 3-node clusters are setup in an active/passive configuration.

Answer: C

Latest 5V0-61.22 Dumps Valid Version with 60 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments