What is the BEST way to handle this situation?

You have implemented a keyword-driven scripting framework, which uses a test execution tool to run the tests. This has been in use for the past year and all of the teams now use this framework as the standard approach for test execution.

The teams all work on different aspects of the SUT and they have all experienced significant benefits in the use of this scripting framework. However, on closer examination, you have discovered that there are numerous instances where the teams have the same functionality to test but are using different keywords.

One of your objectives for improvement is to create consistency among the teams.

What is the BEST way to handle this situation?
A . Move to a model-based approach to scripting where the models include the keywords.
B. Do nothing, each team are working in isolation and they are all experiencing significant benefits in the way they are currently working.
C. Provide each team with a set of guidelines and naming conventions for keywords.
D. Create a central library of keywords and associated definitions for each team to use.

View Answer

Answer: D

Explanation:

By having a shared library, all teams can refer to the same keywords, creating a more consistent and unified scripting approach. This can make it easier to manage and maintain the scripts, especially when different teams need to work together or share resources. It can also reduce the risk of misinterpretations or misunderstandings due to different teams using different keywords for the same functionalities. The other options, while might be valid in some other contexts, do not directly address the issue of consistency among the teams.