Regarding equal-cost routes in an IS-IS network, which of the following descriptions is wrong?

When there are multiple redundant links in the IS-S network, multiple equal-cost routes may appear.

Regarding equal-cost routes in an IS-IS network, which of the following descriptions is wrong?
A . When the number of equal-cost routes in the networking is greater than the number configured through commands, and the priorities of these routes are the same, the route with the higher System ID of the next hop device is preferred for load sharing
B . If negative arbitration sharing is configured, the traffic will be evenly distributed to each link
C . After the equal-cost routing priority is configured, when the IS-IS device forwards the traffic that reaches the destination network segment, it will not adopt the load sharing method, but will forward the traffic to the next-hop with the highest priority.
D . For each route in the equal-cost route, the priority can be specified, and the route with the higher priority will be preferred. The rest are used as backup routes

Answer: C

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments