Does this meet the goal?

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.

After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear in the review screen.

You have a Power BI report that imports a date table and a sales table from an Azure SQL database data source.

The sales table has the following date foreign keys:

✑ Due Date

✑ Order Date

✑ Delivery Date

You need to support the analysis of sales over time based on all the date foreign keys.

Solution: For each date foreign key, you add inactive relationships between the sales table and the date table.

Does this meet the goal?
A . Yes
B. No

Answer: B

Explanation:

You can reference an inactive relationship whit DAX function

USERELATIONSHIP(), but using DAX is not mentioned here.

So follow this refactory methodology:

Create a copy of the role-playing table, providing it with a name that reflects its role. If it’s an Import table, we recommend defining a calculated table. If it’s a DirectQuery table, you can duplicate the Power Query query.

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/power-bi/guidance/relationships-active-inactive

Latest PL-300 Dumps Valid Version with 131 Q&As

Latest And Valid Q&A | Instant Download | Once Fail, Full Refund

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments