Which of the following Medusa commands would potentially provide better results?

During an internal network penetration test the tester is able to compromise a Windows system and recover the NTLM hash for a local wrltsrnAdrain account Attempting to recover the plaintext password by cracking the hash has proved to be unsuccessful, and the tester has decided to try a pass-the-hash attack to see if the credentials are reused on other in-scope systems Using the Medusa tool the tester attempts to authenticate to a list of systems, including the originally compromised host, with no success Given the output below:

Which of the following Medusa commands would potentially provide better results?
A . #medusa -h hosts.txt -U usera.txt -P hashes, txt -M smbnt. -m GROP: LOCAL -O out.txt – m PASS: HASH
B . #medusa -H hosts.txt -U users, txt -P hashes, txt -M smbnt -m PASS: HASH -o out. txt
C . #medusa -H hosts.txt -u WrkStnAdmin -p aa3b435b51404eeaa3b435b51404ee:4e63c1b137e274dda214154b349fe316 -M smbnt -m GROUP: DOMAIN -o out.txt
D . #medusa -H hosts.txt -C creds.txt -M mssq1 -m GROUP: DOMAIN -o out.txt

View Answer

Answer: A