What is the most appropriate response?

During the planning phase of a Slack migration, a key stakeholder suggests compressing the migration schedule to expedite the process.

What is the most appropriate response?
A . Agree to compress the schedule to meet the stakeholder’s request, prioritizing speed over thoroughness
B . Politely decline any changes to the schedule, keeping rigidly to the original plan
C . Assess the risks and benefits of compressing the schedule and discuss them with stakeholders to reach a feasible decision
D . Delegate the decision to compress the schedule to a lower-level management team

View Answer

Answer: C

Explanation:

Assess the risks and benefits of compressing the schedule and discuss them with stakeholders to reach a feasible decision It’s important to consider the impact of compressing the migration schedule, assessing both risks and potential benefits. Discussing these factors with stakeholders allows for a collaborative and informed decision-making process, balancing the need for expediency with the importance of a thorough and smooth migration.

Option A is incorrect because prioritizing speed over thoroughness can lead to oversight and issues during migration.

Option B is incorrect as being inflexible to schedule adjustments can hinder finding the most effective migration strategy.

Option D is incorrect because such a crucial decision should not be delegated to lower-level management without thorough consideration and stakeholder involvement.