What is the correct syntax to monitor /apache/too/logo, /apache/bor/logs, and /apache/bar/l/logo?

What is the correct syntax to monitor /apache/too/logo, /apache/bor/logs, and /apache/bar/l/logo?

A)

B)

C)

D)

A . Option A
B . Option B
C . Option C
D . Option D

View Answer

Answer: B

Explanation:

In the context of Splunk, when configuring data inputs to monitor specific directories, the correct syntax must match the directory paths accurately and adhere to the format recognized by Splunk.

Option A: [monitor:///apache/*/logs] – This syntax would attempt to monitor all directories under /apache/ that contain the word logs, which is not what the question is asking. It is incorrect for the paths given in the question.

Option B: [monitor:///apache/foo/logs, /apache/bar/logs, /apache/bar/1/logs] – This syntax correctly lists the specific paths /apache/foo/logs, /apache/bar/logs, and /apache/bar/1/logs separately. This is the correct answer as it precisely matches the paths given in the question.

Option C: [monitor:///apache/…/logs] – The triple dots syntax (…) is used to match any subdirectories under /apache/. This would monitor all logs directories within any subdirectory structure under /apache/, which again, does not specifically match the paths given in the question.

Option D: [monitor:///apache/foo/logs, /apache/bar/logs, and /apache/bar/1/logs] – This syntax includes the word "and", which is not valid in the Splunk monitor stanza. The syntax should list the paths separated by commas, without additional words.

Thus, Option B is the correct syntax to monitor the specified paths in Splunk.

For additional reference, you can check the official Splunk documentation on monitoring inputs which provides guidelines on how to configure monitoring of files and directories.